I have made no secret on this blog and on various groups and
forums of the struggles I have had with Slavich Unibrom. I have had no end of trouble trying to get
even development and retain highlight detail and I have pretty much given up on
it until I can try out an alternative developer to Fotospeed’s LD20, which is all i have in my stock at the moment.
Having a few hours free (a rare gift from Jess) to print I made
a lith print using some old Agfa Brovira (see previous post). I had to mix up some fresh standard developer
for the test strip so instead of letting that go to waste I decided to try some
straight up printing on Unibrom (sacrilege?) using a negative from about a year
ago when I went on holiday to Scotland.
The image is of a very small plant that I discovered growing out of a
bed of moss on the edge of a forest. It
has good contrast and was well exposed so I thought it would be ideal for seeing
what Unibrom can deliver when it comes to straight up printing.
I made a test strip, chose an exposure and did a flat
print.
It looked good, strong cool
blacks and good highlights.
|
Ignore the dust etc, my scanner is currently filthy! |
It would
need some dodging and burning to get the most out of it though, and i was considering what needed to be done i found my thoughts turning to the lith
developer I had just used.
It still had
some life left in it so why not try some second pass lith?
I have seen some fine examples of this paper
using the second pass method and now seemed like a good opportunity to try it
out.
I got out my potassium ferricyanide/bromide
bleach, bleached the print all the way back, rinsed it and then put it in the
lith developer.
The colours were superb!
The shadows started to build up from a dark
coppery red through to a vivid orange before finally cooling off into grey.
|
Sorry about the orientation - blogger wont let me rotate the images! |
Unfortunately I pulled the print too late and
lost the lovely copper tones in the foreground foliage so I re-bleached it and
tried again.
Alas the print solarised (I’m
no fan of solarisation) so I made a fresh print and tried again.
Unfortunately it failed this time too.
It is going to take a bit of work to make
sure I keep the colour in the foreground at the same time the highlight detail
comes in.
That’s something for me to
work on in my next darkroom session – maybe only partial bleaching…
|
Here's the solarised version |
The only drawback I discovered is that once the print goes
into the fixer the lovely copper tones disappear and turn into a pale golden
yellow – still very pleasing but something of a disappointment after the copper
tones. It's something to keep in mind for future prints though.
|
The print after the fixing bath. I need to try and get this lovely colour into the foreground more. This print is going to take some work i think. |
But still, at least I have found a new use for my supply of
Unibrom – it’s a lovely paper and it’s a shame that I can’t seem to get it to
work for me with straight lith. As I mentioned
before, perhaps a different developer would serve me better. Until I can try that out second pass seems to
be the order of the day. I’m looking
forward to trying it out with some other negatives, hopefully this weekend.
No comments:
Post a Comment